Lobby: Up
Online: 37
Sync Range: 40
* FAQ    * Search
It is currently Tue Mar 19, 2024 7:49 am

All times are UTC




Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ]  Go to page Previous 1 2
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Feb 01, 2019 1:28 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat May 28, 2016 4:34 am
Posts: 127
Zaroua wrote:

Well I had spent quite a few hours spamming CA skills on cooldown on the same mob type (camping NMs gets boring, sue me). While there was some randomness in the results, there were clear thresholds that radically changed the damage output of some spells. Problem was that 1) the damage values and thresholds were very far off of the wiki's values, and 2) not every spell used the same thresholds. Of course, this was done with less than one or two hundred CA casts per spell, so the same size was on the low side. But the results were significant enough to mark TP's contribution to dmg when used with CA to be contrary to the information gathered on the wiki and on various blog sites. Hence my original question: was this fixed?


The DS test you described earlier seems to accurate tbh, you noticed damage increases from 0~149, but found the difference at 150+ to be harder to notice. That to me implies that the small sample coupled with lack of controlled sample of mobs obscured differences, leading to a belief that 150+ does nothing at all, and only noticing larger differences thus giving the impression of the 75~ anchor. What're the other tests you've got, when/where/how were they conducted, the numbers, etc?


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ]  Go to page Previous 1 2

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited