Concepcion wrote:
crippledgimp wrote:
Well yeah I know I can do that. But this is a regular rotating item.
650ish sold in 2 weeks. (60 in stock / 650 sold in 2 weeks = 10%~ THEN 14 days x 10% = 1.5 days~)
By selling oldest item first it rotates stock quicker and regulates the market better. People know what the turn around time is.
I spent 5 days busting my ass farming clusters, ninja scrolls, tele's, yags, monster sigs, ram horns for what should be around 750K, but it's been almost 2 weeks and I've seen like 100k of it lol. The amount of clusters alone I had were like 200k.
You still don't understand the system or what we're trying to tell you. You've latched onto this "newest sells first" without understanding it. THAT ONLY APPLIES TO ITEMS LISTED AT THE EXACT SAME PRICE.
All those people selling before you are listing theirs for prices under 18K. The game chooses the item with lowest listing price and sells that first. Posting date is only used as a tiebreaker between identically priced items.
I could list for 1g, and if someone bid 18K, mine would sell for 18K.
crippledgimp wrote:
Halcyone wrote:
Agreed...
It should really be the oldest item that sells first (for the same price) not the newest.
Put it on the ol' Nas to-do list...
Until then.... 17,999, still works better than 18,000 >.>;;;
Gonna start doing Costco style depending how badly I want it gone lol
Nah brah, I fully understand. Hence the Costco comment.
Absolutely dropping 100 gil will put me before everyone else.
In a real world economic, sharing the same price rotates sellers in this type of situation.
Example, Amazon - The buy box price is $18.99, 14 different people are all selling the item for the same price. Joe Exotic comes in and steals the buy box price for $17.88, then he sells his 12 stock worth of items. Amazon buy box price then goes back up to $18.99, Amazon algorithm rotates seller evenly if the price is the same.
Dude, I sell on Amazon regularly. There are some items that rotate so regularly that they've had the same price for months. It's an "unwritten mutual agreement" between all 14 sellers to keep the same price so we all rotate stock and money. Basic economics
Distributing more money to more people will put more money back in the system.
This went in a strange direction.
Also, is the OP just a general comment/observation? I don't even know if it was intended to promot a discussion, especially given the replies from the OP.