* FAQ    * Search
It is currently Fri Jul 04, 2025 11:40 pm

All times are UTC




Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 274 posts ]  Go to page Previous 1 2 3 4 5 628 Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Jul 22, 2019 5:46 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2019 5:41 am
Posts: 64
For the record, Tankfest by his own admission did come and nuke slept mobs as well, before making some choice comments and leaving. I was not recording at this time as they had seemingly left the zone, but as he himself indicated he was trying to do something "sneaky". If these actions don't clearly describe griefing its probably best Nas himself comment on it to clarify.

at the end of the day he's the only person who's opinion matters.

the funny part here is i didn't want this all over the forums, its redundant, you guys even made comments to the effect, but i guess a guilty conscious is what gave me the pleasure of waking up to this.


Top
   
PostPosted: Mon Jul 22, 2019 5:47 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon May 21, 2018 5:33 pm
Posts: 44
Nazgul wrote:
Tankfest wrote:
Also, is no one going to comment on how they shouldn't have interfered with our run in the first place?

The idea that their DoucheBaggery (DB) in the first place could be perceived as less offensive than us trying to take part of our owed share (without intent to kill them) is ludicrous


You earlier stated

"We had 3 blms at point and a thf and rdm in zone walking to the place"

In the video Hittman said you had 5 people at the stone.

Something just doesn't add up here.


DB had no one in zone, we had all 5 in zone, zone crashes, DB beats our pt to heiroglyphics. We were 100% there first when the zone suspiciously crashed right before they zoned in. Possibly they knew they were 2 pts behind and zoned ownm to try to get some sketchy claim?


Top
   
PostPosted: Mon Jul 22, 2019 5:50 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2016 8:37 pm
Posts: 565
Yep, it's up to nas. Should have recorded the nuking of slept mobs, unless no one died, then it's irrelevant. Stealing people's unclaimed mobs is not and has never been against the rules. Entering on another person's dynamis has never been against the rules. The only time anyone has been banned is because of blatant mpk. We'll see what precedence gets set with this example


Top
   
PostPosted: Mon Jul 22, 2019 5:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2018 3:22 am
Posts: 88
Tankfest wrote:
Nazgul wrote:
Tankfest wrote:
Also, is no one going to comment on how they shouldn't have interfered with our run in the first place?

The idea that their DoucheBaggery (DB) in the first place could be perceived as less offensive than us trying to take part of our owed share (without intent to kill them) is ludicrous


You earlier stated

"We had 3 blms at point and a thf and rdm in zone walking to the place"

In the video Hittman said you had 5 people at the stone.

Something just doesn't add up here.


DB had no one in zone, we had all 5 in zone, zone crashes, DB beats our pt to heiroglyphics. We were 100% there first when the zone suspiciously crashed right before they zoned in. Possibly they knew they were 2 pts behind and zoned ownm to try to get some sketchy claim?


From being in the zone around the same time and what I saw, there was no holding party present when all of this kicked off. The expectation for a holding party is your sleeper, your THF, and two black mages. The rationale for this is that's what it takes to start clearing the zone. A 74 RDM/20 COR is not sleeping for any group (sleepga comes from /BLM). That's not a valid sleeper. Ergo, not a holding party.

_________________
Image


Last edited by Entry on Mon Jul 22, 2019 5:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
   
PostPosted: Mon Jul 22, 2019 5:50 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon May 21, 2018 5:33 pm
Posts: 44
GrendelsPRGuy wrote:
Tankfest wrote:
GrendelsPRGuy wrote:

I'd argue that screwing with other peoples mobs, especially where it results in their death is at minimum griefing and maximum MPK.


Except they weren't their mobs, that was the point of this thread... to establish if the 35 mobs pulled belong to them or just the 6 the server allows them to claim.


They had a pull they were completely in control of until your people showed up with multiple failed horde lullabies, and a couple successful Sleepga II's. You only once attempted to kill them, instead just screwing around with their successful pull & kite.

I don't know you, or have any ties to either of you. With the evidence given I know which crew I'd be cautious around.


We had one successful sleepga 2, off which we set up for a nuke. 5 in our group are SUPER new to buburimu, we don't know a whole lot about the zone like you guys. Apparently DB's actions prior to entry and up to this pull have no weight here, which is what I'm going to snipe their kills in future bubus for.


Top
   
PostPosted: Mon Jul 22, 2019 5:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2018 3:22 am
Posts: 88
Tankfest wrote:
GrendelsPRGuy wrote:
Tankfest wrote:

Except they weren't their mobs, that was the point of this thread... to establish if the 35 mobs pulled belong to them or just the 6 the server allows them to claim.


They had a pull they were completely in control of until your people showed up with multiple failed horde lullabies, and a couple successful Sleepga II's. You only once attempted to kill them, instead just screwing around with their successful pull & kite.

I don't know you, or have any ties to either of you. With the evidence given I know which crew I'd be cautious around.


We had one successful sleepga 2, off which we set up for a nuke. 5 in our group are SUPER new to buburimu, we don't know a whole lot about the zone like you guys. Apparently DB's actions prior to entry and up to this pull have no weight here, which is what I'm going to snipe their kills in future bubus for.


In the video, it looks like Dirac is kiting the pull like normal when you guys sleep. His route takes him past the crabs again after you slept them, at which point some of them wake up. His close proximity due to his kite path at that point and them being separated by the sleepga seems to have resulted in his death by your claimed, not-acted-on crabs.

I asked Dirac for a more complete explanation and got these chat logs:

Image
Image
Image

Edit: Apparently the RDM, Miroqu, was the 74 RDM/20 COR.

_________________
Image


Last edited by Entry on Mon Jul 22, 2019 5:57 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Top
   
PostPosted: Mon Jul 22, 2019 6:01 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon May 21, 2018 5:33 pm
Posts: 44
Whatever man, whatever happens is gonna happen. I'm at peace with our actions, and I know the DB party pulled some sketchy stuff and went back on our agreement. I'm going to enter bubu every time Dirac &friends do with a pt of 4 blms and snipe their AoE pulls when they are low hp. If Nasomi decides to ban me over any of this so be it, in that case this server is so upside down I'd rather not be here. Maybe make rules more clear or fix dynamis rules.


Top
   
PostPosted: Mon Jul 22, 2019 6:01 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2019 9:56 pm
Posts: 218
Entry wrote:
We had one successful sleepga 2, off which we set up for a nuke. 5 in our group are SUPER new to buburimu, we don't know a whole lot about the zone like you guys. Apparently DB's actions prior to entry and up to this pull have no weight here, which is what I'm going to snipe their kills in future bubus for.


I feel as though you are digging your own grave here now with that last statement. EDIT: And you keep piling it on.

In general people should be nicer though. Good attitudes and communication goes a long way. There was evidently a breakdown of communication here and we can see what it led too.


Last edited by Nazgul on Mon Jul 22, 2019 6:03 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Top
   
PostPosted: Mon Jul 22, 2019 6:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2018 3:22 am
Posts: 88
Oh, and as humorous as this was to read after Dirac put it in discord, this is getting close to harassment.

Image

_________________
Image


Top
   
PostPosted: Mon Jul 22, 2019 6:03 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 06, 2017 2:35 pm
Posts: 2629
parz wrote:
For the record, Tankfest by his own admission did come and nuke slept mobs as well, before making some choice comments and leaving. I was not recording at this time as they had seemingly left the zone, but as he himself indicated he was trying to do something "sneaky". If these actions don't clearly describe griefing its probably best Nas himself comment on it to clarify.

at the end of the day he's the only person who's opinion matters.

the funny part here is i didn't want this all over the forums, its redundant, you guys even made comments to the effect, but i guess a guilty conscious is what gave me the pleasure of waking up to this.



Like I said, I don't believe griefing is really against the rules here. at least, not explicitly that's for sure. I think the THF could have kited the crabs forever, and been just fine. I also think someone might stop running when someone tries to claim mobs that they have hate on, and that is why he died.

Either way, I'd generally recommend you play on Nasomi with the intention of never having to explain yourself to him.. because if that happens, it could take you 6-8 weeks to actually get a resolution.

_________________
Kazen wrote:
...TopShelf told Nas to roll back all your ZNM gear, do the gilpocalypse and nerf Fishing/RNG into the ground.


Image


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 274 posts ]  Go to page Previous 1 2 3 4 5 628 Next

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 68 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited