Renavi wrote:
Starbright wrote:
Renavi wrote:
He said it exactly how it was said in the screenshot. You've repeatedly brought up that he meant to use different words when he's never said that even once in any of his responses. Maybe you should try to understand that. He specifically said nobody was stealing anything, in a private conversation about the server that was leaked. Why tf would he say that in a private conversation, if the goal was to steal the server? Even the leaked conversation says why it's necessary, because GM doesn't need the risk of it in his life. It's not even mentioned whether Setzor would take over or not, you all just assumed it. Just that 'the devs' would. I know it's hard to think of having more than one dev and decision maker, but it is possible.
I was giving him the benefit of the doubt. If he didn't mean to use different words, than what he was saying is pretty straight forward. Though he did say he wished he'd used different words, so I was going from that.
Why would he say he intended to steal the server in a private conversation...? As opposed to... a public one? I don't believe anyone has assumed Setzor would take over.
He literally never said he meant to use different words lmao. Why would he clarify in a private conversation about server ownership, that obviously was only leaked to start drama, about not stealing the server. That people then still went and ignored anyway, even though the clarification was leaked too. Yes as opposed to a public conversation, didn't think that would need to be said but obviously if the goal was the steal the server he would've lied about it publicly had the conversation happened that way. The convo about it wasn't public though, so why would he lie about it there? The simplest answer is usually the right one, if you didn't know that.
This is how someone recognizes that they used the wrong words to explain their feelings. His first pass at explaining that was to say he "lacked candor". And yes, I’m familiar with Occam’s razor. I’m not the one trying to explain why the very straight forward conversation in a private setting leaking isn’t actually what the person meant, now that it’s public.
You’re right. Sometimes the simplest explanation is the right one.. which is he meant exactly what he said privately.
setzor wrote:
I may have been inappropriate with my phrasing
Sharkbite wrote:
Just a bunch of stupid kids who know nothing, also dirt poor irl.
No one sends a letter they are sending a C&D Lol they just send the C&D
Gullable children
This isn't true, in 2020. Many large companies send a digital copy to a host/representative law firm ahead of the official copy being received certified mail.
But for real.. Project much? You make forum accounts over and over to continue to make fun of dirt poor stupid kids.