Quote:
In my opinion, this rule, as it is written, is vague and should be clarified.
It absolutely should. Nas has a certain 'way' with words that seems purposefully vague and often leads to misunderstandings.
Quote:
1. Character A is fishing. Character B is running around tabbing for a logging point. Character B finds a logging point. Character A stops fishing. Character B proceeds to log. When the logging point is exhausted, Character A resumes fishing. Violation?
Violation.
Quote:
2. Character A is fishing. Character B is standing near where a logging point will pop and is spamming tab. The rest of scenario 1 applies. Violation?
Violation.
Quote:
3. Character A is fishing. Character B is logged out near where a logging point will pop. Character B intuits when the logging point will pop. The rest of scenario 1 applies. Violation?
Violation.
Sources: precedents set by people being punished in those scenarios.
I realize you are not trolling, but you must understand that you're looking for a very concrete definition when none exists. You could argue "it's been 5 minutes since I did HELMF on one character, I should be able to do it now on another, how dare you jail me!" but nas isn't going to care about your argument. He makes his own judgement. If anything seems even to be edging towards dualbox HELMF then you bet it will be counted against your favor by nas.
Always be on the cautious side with the rules. It makes sense to want to know specifics, but the truth is that there are and will never be specifics for you to follow.
edit: basically, what exe said.
edit2: if it helps, in addition to the current HELMF dualbox rules, nas explicitly stated that you shouldn't even have 2 chars in the same zone if one is doing HELM. Fishing not included (you can, for example, fish up Devil Mantas and kill them on a 2nd char). This is because you could park a 2nd char for knowing where a point is, either by seeing one or through widescan, basically. And he explicitly mentioned online OR offline.
It may all seem silly but nas really wants to make HELMF both worth it (by limiting dualboxing of it) and to limit how much one person can do. It's an economy thing.
Hopefully nas at least allows for 2 people on the same IP to HELMF at the same time. It's a bit silly that it's 1 per IP instead of 1 per person.