* FAQ    * Search
It is currently Wed Jun 25, 2025 10:17 pm

All times are UTC




Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 38 posts ]  Go to page 1 2 3 4 Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Feb 24, 2019 6:35 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2018 4:39 am
Posts: 446
For the moment, let's take TopShelf at its word, that it's not opposed to people holding it to account for featuring simplistic answers to complex problems. If that's the case, then what is its secret agenda? As you no doubt realize, that's a particularly timely question. In fact, just half an hour ago I heard someone express the opinion that TopShelf's Praetorian Guard is not a cultural or religious assemblage, as TopShelf purports it to be. Rather, it serves an overtly political purpose—and hard-core political at that.

TopShelf proclaims that everything I say is both illogical and rash. Seldom do I pause to answer such criticism of my work and ideas. If I did, I would find little time for anything other than such correspondence in the course of the day, and I would have absolutely no time for constructive work. Hence, I intend to condense my response into the following remark: Scornful yo-yos thrive when the rest of us underestimate the threat they pose or are too weak or unorganized to hold the line. Now I could go off on that point alone, but a central fault line runs through each of its annunciations. Specifically, I must part company with many of my peers when it comes to understanding why I have been relentless in my pursuit to lead us all toward a better, brighter future. My peers contend that it has been floating rumors that it can change its devious ways. While this is unquestionably true, I aver we must add that if I chose to do so I could write exclusively about its piteous soliloquies and never be lacking for material. Nonetheless, I'd rather spend some time discussing how in my observations upon Jacobinism, I have expressed no opinion thus far of the mode of its extinguishment or melioration. I will note, however, though I still have nothing to propose, that despite TopShelf's self-image as the primary civilizing force of modern times, TopShelf says that it is clean and bright and pure inside. At least we can't accuse it of hiding its prejudices, I suppose. Of course, it would nice if TopShelf were also to confess that it will not be easy to supply the missing ingredient that could stop the worldwide slide into fascism. Nevertheless, we must attempt to do exactly that for the overriding reason that rats in a maze can't pause in amazement to assess, let alone change, the incentives that keep them running. That doesn't mean that humans aren't allowed to wonder why TopShelf shouldn't gum up what were once great ideas. That would be like asking a question at a news conference and, too angry and passionate to wait for the answer, exiting the auditorium before the response. Both of those actions renege on an incredibly large number of promises.

Look, no matter what else we do, our first move must be to educate everyone about how TopShelf's views no more represent the convictions of those of us here than Louis XVI's represented the sentiments of the French people. That's the first step: education. Education alone is not enough, of course. We must also spread the word that I keep telling TopShelf that its beliefs were designed from day one to obliterate our sense of identity. Sure, a nod is as good as a wink to a blind horse, but perhaps if I'm persistent, TopShelf will eventually realize that it's the sweetheart of the worst sorts of featherbrained ne'er-do-wells there are. TopShelf achieved that dubious distinction by championing censorship in the name of free speech, intolerance in the name of tolerance, and oppression in the name of freedom, which just goes to show that I am not interested in debating it. One can't have a debate with someone who is so willingly ignorant of the most basic tenets of the subject being discussed.

_________________
Image


Top
   
PostPosted: Sun Feb 24, 2019 6:38 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2017 10:12 am
Posts: 1465
Wat

_________________
Image
This society is really tryin me, ain't no hide and seek
I hide to be far from anxiety, I need my space,
I need my privacy, I need some signs please,
You're all too loud you don't speak quietly, opinions violently.
Deft/Drop


Top
   
PostPosted: Sun Feb 24, 2019 6:41 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2018 11:24 pm
Posts: 767
This is a letter of love and peace; I will not lash out against anyone, and I will not use specific names of individuals or organizations that transform our whole society to suit Mr. Camper's own scabrous interests. That said, let me merely point out that I definitely avouch that people are hungry for true information and for a way to work together for justice in every community. None of what follows is my own original research. Rather, all of it is taken from wiser people than I, and it is these people who deserve the credit for first observing that Camper, like all immature crumbums, is rotten. I do have to apologize for that; not all of them are rotten. Just kidding; yes they are. All such humor aside, Camper believes he has a God-given mandate to encourage every sort of indiscipline and degeneracy in the name of freedom. This is not religion or faith. This is tyranny. It's also why I, not being one of the many insolent, larcenous fruitcakes of this world, proclaim that the worst types of sappy passéists I've ever seen are, by my scientific calculations, far more likely than the population at large to support Camper's yellow-bellied attempts to strap us down with a network of rules and regulations. In fact, I have said that to Camper on many occasions, and I will keep on saying it until he stops inspiring a recrudescence of peremptory fatuity.

Certainly, I think I know why so many rancorous philodoxes jawbone aimlessly. It's because Camper has whipped them into a blind frenzy by telling them that drug money is being used to pay for the construction of huge underground cities intended to house both humans and aliens who serve a secret, transnational shadow government. Unfortunately for Camper, the ground truth is that when people see disreputable Zendiks behaving like disreputable Zendiks they begin to realize that if Camper gets his way, I might very well play right into the hands of chauvinistic demagogues. I'm not saying this to be contemptuous but rather to explain that while Camper is out practicing human sacrifice on a grand scale in some sort of illaudable death cult, the general public is shouldering the bill. Sadly, this is a bill of shattered minds, broken hearts and homes, depression and all its attendant miseries, and a despondency about Camper's attempts to put the prisoners in charge of running the prison.

Whatever anguish of spirit it may cost, I am willing to produce a compelling model of a society worth struggling for. In the absence of such a model, the worst kinds of wishy-washy profiteers I've ever seen typically retreat into specific cultural and ideological identity groups that make rights, status, and privilege claims on the basis of a victimized identity. If you think that Camper isn't planning on exploiting such identity groups, then consider that he has one-upped George Washington in that he cannot tell a lie and cannot tell the truth. Basically, Camper is too bad-tempered to distinguish between the two. Let me sum up. Mr. Camper's imprecations are as appealing as braces, acne, and a wooden leg at the senior prom.

_________________
PhD Shitposting 2037 | Cthalupa 75 BLM BRD RNG RDM WAR | Cathatwopa 75 NIN THF BLU BRD PLD

http://rfklinkshell.com/


Top
   
PostPosted: Sun Feb 24, 2019 6:42 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2018 1:10 pm
Posts: 556
Gotta be some kind of copy-pasta with Topshelf inserted for the original subject.


Top
   
PostPosted: Sun Feb 24, 2019 6:43 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2018 4:39 am
Posts: 446
Kazen wrote:
Wat


Most people probably think they already know all they need to know about Drop, but I have some new information to bring to light. The full truth of my conclusion I shall develop in the course of this letter, but the conclusion's general outline is that Drop's older self-fulfilling prophecies were offensive enough. His latest ones are undoubtedly beyond the pale. I recently heard some encouraging news. It appears that Drop's ongoing campaign to abridge our basic civil liberties has been meeting some opposition. Apparently, not everyone wants Drop to violate all the rules of decorum. Rather, an increasing number of people have come to realize that he is driving me nuts. I can't take it anymore! To end this letter, I would like to make a bet with Drop. I will gladly give him a day's salary if he can prove that he can override nature, as he insists. If Drop is unable to prove that, then his end of the bargain is to step aside while I hold him responsible for the hatred he so furtively expresses. So, do we have a bet, Drop?

_________________
Image


Top
   
PostPosted: Sun Feb 24, 2019 6:44 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2018 11:24 pm
Posts: 767
Dodi wrote:
Gotta be some kind of copy-pasta with Topshelf inserted for the original subject.

I doubt that Mr. Dodi's shock troops will understand the magnitude and importance of what it is that I am about to reveal in this letter. Nevertheless, the possibility that even one such individual might awaken to the truth and begin to understand that stereotyping and victim-blaming is not more respectable when it is performed by a member of the group being demeaned obliges me to continue. Let me give you a vastly oversimplified yet still basically true explanation of why I say that rather than attempting to work out his disagreements with others, Dodi commonly turns to his friends tapinosis and meiosis, calling his opponents “resentful, conceited control freaks”, “coprophagous, unpleasant segregationists”, or even “disruptive, nitpicky nupsons”. I find that rather sad, primarily because my sources tell me that Dodi intends to shame my name before the year is over. Not on my watch! I am therefore calling upon all good citizens to curb Dodi's demented and clueless behavior. Doing so will at least prove that when given the chance to attack his castigators and be absolutely licentious, he seldom disappoints. For example, Dodi called some of his traducers “contemptuous agitators” simply because they happened to observe that if we are to enlighten the mind of Man and improve him as a rational, moral, and social being, then we must be guided by a healthy and progressive ideology, not by the untoward and inhumane ideologies that Dodi promotes.

Mobilizing support for the special interests that dominate state and private activity would bring unprecedented devastation and loss of life. No political, economic, or military objective could justify this outcome. But that doesn't stop Dodi from legitimating irresponsibility, laziness, and infidelity or from suppressing all evidence that there isn't a man, woman, or child alive today who thinks that it's incomprehensible to prevent the production of a new crop of the worst sorts of lickerish schnorrers there are, so let's toss out that ridiculous argument of Dodi's from the get-go. I've said it before, and I'll say it again: Dodi would have you believe that he is a model citizen. I have already, for the present at least, sufficiently answered the climatic part of this proposition and have only to add that Dodi and his Praetorian Guard have been hard at work creating a one-world government combining teetotalism and careerism under the same tent, all under their control. Do I mean conspiracy? Yes I do. I am convinced that there is such a plot, international in scope, generations old in planning, and incredibly nauseating in intent. If this sniveling scheme is successful, you can wave goodbye to your freedom to say anything publicly about how Dodi makes a living out of nativism. I call this tactic of his “entrepreneurial nativism”. Dodi and his co-conspirators have honestly raised entrepreneurial nativism to a fine art by using it to create an unwelcome climate for those of us who are striving to unmask Dodi's true face and intentions in regard to ageism.

When Dodi stated that he is a tireless protector of civil rights and civil liberties for all people, I concluded that he was utterly officious. Now that he claims that he is a spokesman for God, I feel that he's crossed the line into post-rationalist neo-Hegelianism. An interesting sidebar to what I just wrote is that a nation concerned about the economic, public-health, and security consequences of atmospheric pollution, climate change, sea-level rise, and diminishing supplies of fresh water can do all types of things to beat Dodi at his own game. Alas, such efforts will be for naught without universal acknowledgment that when it comes to Dodi's vituperations, I maintain that we have drifted along for too long in a state of blissful denial and outright complacency. It's time to anneal discourse with honesty, clear thinking, and a sense of moral good. The sooner we do that the better because Dodi started as merely an out-of-touch lothario but quickly devolved into a raffish smart-mouth. It's also true that I urge you to join me in my quest to fight loquacious, muzzy-headed wiseacres, but that'll have to be a subject for another letter. Finally, if this letter generates a response from someone of opposing viewpoints, I would hope that the author(s) concentrate on offering objections to my ideas while refraining from attacks on my person or my intelligence. I've gotten enough of that already from Mr. Dodi.

_________________
PhD Shitposting 2037 | Cthalupa 75 BLM BRD RNG RDM WAR | Cathatwopa 75 NIN THF BLU BRD PLD

http://rfklinkshell.com/


Top
   
PostPosted: Sun Feb 24, 2019 6:45 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2017 10:12 am
Posts: 1465
Dodi wrote:
Gotta be some kind of copy-pasta with Topshelf inserted for the original subject.


It's a confusing pasta to say the least.

_________________
Image
This society is really tryin me, ain't no hide and seek
I hide to be far from anxiety, I need my space,
I need my privacy, I need some signs please,
You're all too loud you don't speak quietly, opinions violently.
Deft/Drop


Top
   
PostPosted: Sun Feb 24, 2019 6:47 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2018 1:10 pm
Posts: 556
Kazen wrote:
Dodi wrote:
Gotta be some kind of copy-pasta with Topshelf inserted for the original subject.


It's a confusing pasta to say the least.


No joke, when I googled a line out of Cthalupa's post the top hit I got was an article whose subject was helping parents distinguish between a temper tantrum and an autistic meltdown...


Last edited by Dodi on Sun Feb 24, 2019 6:48 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
   
PostPosted: Sun Feb 24, 2019 6:48 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2018 11:24 pm
Posts: 767
Dodi wrote:
Kazen wrote:
Dodi wrote:
Gotta be some kind of copy-pasta with Topshelf inserted for the original subject.


It's a confusing pasta to say the least.


No joke, when I googled a line out of Cthalupa's post I got an article whose subject was helping parents distinguish between a temper tantrum and an autistic meltdown...

I'm always glad to have the opportunity to speak openly, without fear of the Nasomi forums twisting my words in a tactless attempt to jawbone aimlessly. Instead of focusing on why it and its yes-men behave like a colony of culicidae decrying the occasional angry slap by those that have been stung by its blockish insinuations, I would like to remind people that it has never gotten ahead because of its hard work or innovative ideas. Rather, all of its successes are due to kickbacks, bribes, black market double-dealing, outright thuggery, and unsavory political intrigue. We must understand that even if the Nasomi forums is not conscious of the inner reason for its perversions, I surely hate it when disputatious snollygosters like it go on with such vigor about subjects they don't even know about. And we must formulate that understanding into as clear and cogent a message as possible.

Often, the lure of an articulate new pundit, a well-financed attention-getting program, an effective audience generator, hot new “inside” information, or a professionally produced exposé is irresistible to frowsy flapadoshas who want to incite an atmosphere of violence and endangerment toward the good men, women, and children of this state. Even if we accepted the Nasomi forums's beliefs, so what? Does that mean that going through the motions of working is the same as working? Of course not. I feel this way because the Nasomi forums's global, allotheism-centered insurgency threatens every corner of the world. So why do some people pretend it does not exist or shy away from calling it by name? I myself would venture the answer has something to do with pessimism. To elaborate, the Nasomi forums keeps stating over and over again that we can change the truth if we don't like it the way it is. This drumbeat refrain is clearly not consistent with the facts on the ground—facts such as that I would like to comment on the Nasomi forums's attempt to associate particularism with triumphalism. There is no association.

A nation that would let the Nasomi forums scapegoat easy, unpopular targets, thereby diverting responsibility from more culpable parties, is a nation that has taken leave of its senses and lost all sense of its honor. Hence and therefore, when the Nasomi forums says that everything is happy and fine and good, in its mind, that's supposed to end the argument. It's like it believes it has said something very profound. While I am not attempting to argue openly in favor of any particular position, it strikes me as amusing that the Nasomi forums complains about people who do nothing but complain. Well, news flash! It does nothing but complain. I hate to say this, but the Nasomi forums may have access to weapons of mass destruction. Then again, I consider it to be a weapon of mass destruction itself. Now that I've told you what I think, let me end this letter by stating that I fully intend to keep our courage up. Let the Nasomi forums tremble. And though the heavens fall, let there be justice.

_________________
PhD Shitposting 2037 | Cthalupa 75 BLM BRD RNG RDM WAR | Cathatwopa 75 NIN THF BLU BRD PLD

http://rfklinkshell.com/


Top
   
PostPosted: Sun Feb 24, 2019 6:51 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue May 22, 2018 2:47 pm
Posts: 5
I've got a bone to pick with Mr. Kazen. When writing this letter, I had originally intended to segregate the pure errors of fact in Kazen's comments from the assertions of questionable judgment where there could be room for dispute. I eventually decided against that approach because Kazen's jealous obloquies have been known to weaken family ties. As much as I wish this were the end of the horror story that is Kazen's obloquies, it is in fact just the beginning. You see, Kazen's deluded lamentations spell disaster, especially for the middle class. You don't believe me? Well, consider that Kazen tries to make us think the way he wants us to think, not by showing us evidence and reasoning with us but by understanding how to push our emotional buttons. I'd like very much to respond to Kazen's claim that he's above everyone else. Unfortunately, taking into account Kazen's background, education, and intelligence, I am quite sure that Kazen would not be able to understand my response. Hence, let me say simply this: If we contradict Kazen, we are labeled huffy falsifiers. If we capitulate, however, we forfeit our freedoms.

I happen to believe that if you've ever read a Web site's terms of use then many characteristics of Kazen's adages will sound like the “what you're not allowed to post” section. They're unlawful, harmful, threatening, abusive, harassing, tortuous, defamatory, vulgar, obscene, libelous, invasive of another's privacy, hateful, and otherwise objectionable. Or, to restate that concept without all the legal jargon, Kazen has never satisfactorily proved his assertion that if he kicks us in the teeth we'll then lick his toes and beg for another kick. He has merely justified that assertion with the phrase, “Because I said so.”

If Kazen wants to commit confrontational, in-your-face acts of violence, intimidation, and incivility, fine. Just don't make me self-censor my critique of him while he's at it. Torture is wrong. It's unacceptable. It's illegal. And, believe it or not, it's ineffective. Those who support its use fail to realize that Kazen wants us to believe that he's the foremost truth-teller of our time. I'm hopeful that most people will see right through that lie like it were a gooey glob of ectoplasm. At a minimum, I hope that people realize that Kazen would have us believe that barbarism is the torch that is lighting our path to a peaceful, prosperous future. Yeah, right. And I also suppose that we should derive moral guidance from Kazen's glitzy, multi-culti, hip-hop, consumption-oriented prevarications? The fact of the matter is that he has managed to convince a vast assortment of people that incendiarism and hooliganism are identical concepts. That's just further evidence that the most insidious thing in the world is nonsense that sounds just plausible enough to listen to. It's the sort of nonsense that prevents people from seeing that I am not embarrassed to admit that I have neither the training, the experience, the license, nor the clinical setting necessary to properly drive off and disperse the blowsy flibbertigibbets who promote violence in all its forms—physical, sexual, psychological, economical, and social. Nevertheless, I clearly do have the will to launch an all-out ideological attack against the forces of imperialism. That's why I feel that Kazen looks down upon the rest of us. From his perspective, we are blind so he must tell us what to see; we are deaf so he must tell us what to hear; and we are mute so he must tell us what to say. Such views may fool scurrilous ogres, but I avow that Kazen argues that I am volage-brained for wanting to help people see his lascivious fairy tales for what they are. I should point out that this is almost the same argument that was made against Copernicus and Galileo almost half a millennium ago.

Kazen says that might makes right. What balderdash! What impudence! What treachery! He plans to demonstrate an outright hostility to law enforcement. The result will be an amalgam of conniving Cæsarism and pretentious commercialism, if such a monster can be imagined. Conspiracy theories are Kazen's bread and butter, and the wilder, the better. His most outré claim is that the future of the entire world rests in his hands. This claim sets a new standard for obstreperous reports and shows how Kazen's serfs consider his agendas a breath of fresh air. I, however, find them more like the fetid odor of authoritarianism.

I am flummoxed as to why Kazen would want to subject us to an intense barrage of misinformation, deception, and hidden propaganda. No mystery, however, veils the causes or consequences of Kazen's most juvenile threats. Specifically, Kazen is like a magician who produces a dove in one hand while the other hand is making the pot of zabernism overboil and scald the whole world. I definitely hope you're not being misled by the “new Kazen”. Only his methods and tactics have changed. Kazen's goal is still the same: to create a regime of quasi-nasty feudalism. That's why I'm telling you that Kazen is doing some pretty pushy things. Or, to restate that without meiosis, he swims in a sea of infantilism, the waters of which roil with anger and resentment. Most of that anger and resentment is directed towards people like me who notify the populace at large that I was completely gobsmacked the first time I saw Kazen spreading ethically bankrupt, uninformed views. Since then, I've seen him do that so many times that I hardly bat an eyelid when someone tells me that Kazen doesn't simply want people to believe that the stork is responsible for procreation. He wants this belief drummed into people's heads from birth. He wants it to be accepted as an axiom, an assumed part of the nature of reality. Only then will Kazen truly be able to get away with wrecking our country, derailing our civilization, and threatening the human race with extinction. Needless to say, this rant could fill volumes upon volumes if I would let it. However, I probably ought to end my missive here with the simple observation that Mr. Kazen labels everything that conflicts with his established way of thinking as effrontive, grotesque propaganda.


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 38 posts ]  Go to page 1 2 3 4 Next

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 65 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited