You don’t have to be in a logic, rhetoric, or writing intensive course. It doesn’t mean that you shouldn’t practice basic argumentation skills that everyone establishes through their schooling at an early age.

Do they also teach you to accept defeat with grace?

Uhh unless the explicit purpose of your argument is to solely troll the person that obviously clearly believes Internet forums should follow the rules of debate.

_________________

Like that persons comment you didn’t respond to when he corrected you on sample size and why the deleted threads was silencing those who had a voice? Or how about you accused me of posting on most those shut down threads because it was me being bashed for my views, when I didn’t even give my input in them aside from the thread with the poll? I don’t think I lost, and the fact you haven’t affirmed that persons point shows you lack any substance in that claim you have.

In regards to you Wolff; it shows you don’t care about hearing the other side and are living honestly in your echo chamber and use the facade that it’s under the name of trolling. It shows you don’t have any respect with fellow players who don’t share your own opinion. It’s sad that someone ignores this and tries to pass it as “trolling”.

deadwingdeadwingdeadwingdeadwingdeadwingdeadwingdeadwingdeadwingdeadwingdeadwingdeadwingdeadwingdeadwingdeadwingdeadwingdeadwingdeadwingdeadwingdeadwingdeadwingdeadwingdeadwingdeadwingdeadwingdeadwingdeadwingdeadwingdeadwingdeadwingdeadwingdeadwingdeadwingdeadwingdeadwingdeadwingdeadwingdeadwing

_________________
this was more funny before everyone copied Kanodin

Big if true

_________________

Nathano, this is my last attempt to speak reasonably with you. You have been objectively wrong on points proven throughout this thread. Just because someone includes an insult in their rebuttal, it doesn't make their points any less correct. If you can't take a bit of name calling when having a debate on the internet, stay off the internet.

Now that all of this is said, I still feel you're retarded for continuing to post the same things over and over.

"Waaaaaaah, you called me a name and you automatically lose if you do that in a debate."

Heck outta here, if that's how things worked the US would have a different president currently.

_________________

This society is really tryin me, ain't no hide and seek
I hide to be far from anxiety, I need my space,
I need my privacy, I need some signs please,
You're all too loud you don't speak quietly, opinions violently.
Deft/Drop

For hecks same, what am I debating if I said I’m happy with what Nas did? If you’re going to call me names and take it there, you better tell me what I am arguing if I agreed what Nas did. Or is this too simplistic for you to understand?

You literally said that the people complaining about PW items have more leverage with 300/1500 people than those at the relic rollback. Shut the heck up and go play somewhere else. Your name is ruined here and you will never be able to accomplish anything of note.

_________________

This society is really tryin me, ain't no hide and seek
I hide to be far from anxiety, I need my space,
I need my privacy, I need some signs please,
You're all too loud you don't speak quietly, opinions violently.
Deft/Drop

Apparently you didn’t read enough to see the moment that Nas created the buyout program I conceded my point. Concede means to forfeit a position or claim. Nas listened and something was done. I have said repeatedly again and again that if he compensated, I would support Nas. That was compensating.

Now you look like a hecking ass for assuming I kept pushing the same point and continuing to be against Nas after he made a compromise. Yet you missed time and time again I was supporting Nas in his updated decision. I will not go the heck anywhere I will play here and you will have to deal with it.