* FAQ    * Search
It is currently Wed Jun 25, 2025 10:01 am

All times are UTC




Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 166 posts ]  Go to page Previous 15 6 7 8 917 Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Dec 20, 2018 9:35 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2018 4:56 pm
Posts: 54
Once more, I have never claimed that the damage formuae we have today are correct. I don't understand what point you're trying to make. We both agree that the numbers are too low overall. However, this alone does not justify a blind buff just to inflate the numbers.

The stated goal of this server is not to make Nasomi-XI. It's to make ToAU-XI. Changing the numbers to anything that is not ToAU-XI is incorrect.

If your intention is to play on a server that does not attempt to emulate era-accuracy, this server's mission statement is contrary to your goals.

Nabutso has explicitly stated a path for you to test the system and find discrepancies. Nabutso has explicitly stated that if discrepancies are proven, the damage formulae will be shifted.

Put in the work or don't put in the work.


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Dec 20, 2018 9:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2018 1:37 am
Posts: 416
violetnce wrote:
The stated goal of this server is not to make Nasomi-XI. It's to make ToAU-XI.


You got that backwards, buddeh.


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Dec 20, 2018 9:42 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 06, 2017 2:35 pm
Posts: 2629
Chakan wrote:
violetnce wrote:
The stated goal of this server is not to make Nasomi-XI. It's to make ToAU-XI.


You got that backwards, buddeh.

_________________
Kazen wrote:
...TopShelf told Nas to roll back all your ZNM gear, do the gilpocalypse and nerf Fishing/RNG into the ground.


Image


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Dec 20, 2018 9:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2016 2:38 pm
Posts: 517
Location: Port Windurst
violetnce wrote:
Once more, I have never claimed that the damage formuae we have today are correct. I don't understand what point you're trying to make. We both agree that the numbers are too low overall. However, this alone does not justify a blind buff just to inflate the numbers.

The stated goal of this server is not to make Nasomi-XI. It's to make ToAU-XI. Changing the numbers to anything that is not ToAU-XI is incorrect.

If your intention is to play on a server that does not attempt to emulate era-accuracy, this server's mission statement is contrary to your goals.

Nabutso has explicitly stated a path for you to test the system and find discrepancies. Nabutso has explicitly stated that if discrepancies are proven, the damage formulae will be shifted.

Put in the work or don't put in the work.


I think I finally understand now; you have no reading comprehension. Never once did Nabutso say that.

_________________
啦體恩的雨水主要下降在其原野中
Making gil starting out!
Nasomi troubleshooting!


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Dec 20, 2018 9:50 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2018 4:56 pm
Posts: 54
Nabutso wrote:
There was a ton of data from a JP blog someone posted a few weeks ago with nukes vs elementals in sky. I don't have it on-hand, but I bet if someone did those same tests, and things were different, that things would change


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Dec 20, 2018 9:51 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2016 11:14 pm
Posts: 194
Kubisnaxx wrote:
It’s also safe to assume why quick draw is so bad with resists now, you’re basically throwing money away at an HNM because the macc is so bad rn. I’ve assumed that qd is coded like magic even though it’s not supposed to be, the only thing magic about it is that it does magic damage.


It extends to all magic damage afaik, so quick draw, merit BPs, and elemental ws (which I think are hecked in their own right).

_________________
this was more funny before everyone copied Kanodin


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Dec 20, 2018 9:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2016 2:38 pm
Posts: 517
Location: Port Windurst
violetnce wrote:
Nabutso wrote:
There was a ton of data from a JP blog someone posted a few weeks ago with nukes vs elementals in sky. I don't have it on-hand, but I bet if someone did those same tests, and things were different, that things would change


Yes, very good violetnce, exactly I bet. Jesus christ, you're not as smart as you think you are, just stop.

_________________
啦體恩的雨水主要下降在其原野中
Making gil starting out!
Nasomi troubleshooting!


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Dec 20, 2018 9:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2016 4:50 pm
Posts: 53
I feel like you're just asking to be roasted here by players who have been playing for longer than the 2 days you've been here...


Last edited by Kohta on Thu Dec 20, 2018 9:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Dec 20, 2018 9:57 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 06, 2017 2:35 pm
Posts: 2629
violetnce wrote:
Nabutso wrote:
There was a ton of data from a JP blog someone posted a few weeks ago with nukes vs elementals in sky. I don't have it on-hand, but I bet if someone did those same tests, and things were different, that things would change



That doesn’t say what you said it says, and it can’t because Nab never promises anything when it comes to Nas. Which you might know if you didn’t get here 2 months ago.

_________________
Kazen wrote:
...TopShelf told Nas to roll back all your ZNM gear, do the gilpocalypse and nerf Fishing/RNG into the ground.


Image


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Dec 20, 2018 9:58 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2018 4:56 pm
Posts: 54
Only one way to find out.

Put up or shut up.


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 166 posts ]  Go to page Previous 15 6 7 8 917 Next

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited