* FAQ    * Search
It is currently Sat Aug 23, 2025 7:21 am

All times are UTC




Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 132 posts ]  Go to page Previous 1 2 3 4 514 Next

How many more months until nasomi adds content?
1-3 Months 20%  20%  [ 12 ]
4-6 Months 10%  10%  [ 6 ]
6-12 Months 39%  39%  [ 23 ]
Never 31%  31%  [ 18 ]
Total votes: 59
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Apr 29, 2020 6:29 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2017 11:55 pm
Posts: 223
Location: In your moms bed
Savok wrote:
Currently Server 1 and Server 2 DNS are pointed to the same IP address. What else you got going on there chief?


was pinging server couple weeks ago at 17-30.... now im pinging server two at 150-180 and server one is same just worse.

told everyone to "plan accordingly" days ago for maintenance that day.... did that maintenance ever happen? nope

_________________
SapaJoee / SapDaddy

Best PLD on Nasomi
Best BRD on Nasomi
TopShelf MVP 2017-2020
Voted Nasomi Server Player of the Century Award
Sackholder in TS


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Apr 29, 2020 6:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2018 1:30 pm
Posts: 37
Changing the DNS records wouldn't require a server maintenance. Honestly not sure why Nasomi has it setup that way for the last 13 days, but i'm sure he has his reasons.

If Zigma is still claiming and purple for everyone else he either is overriding DNS to still point to server 1 or worst has found a way to get Nasomi's direct IP.


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Apr 29, 2020 8:52 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2018 1:51 pm
Posts: 510
Savok , is proably easier than that , he uses some bot-claiming program but the most common way to justify 100% claims recently on nasomi is to show amazing low ping. His image is probably a fake

_________________
Image

Image

Image


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Apr 29, 2020 9:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2016 2:23 am
Posts: 1143
Literally any mob that he wants to remain a competitive part of the game needs to be changed to auto claim. Ever since the Zigma video everyone has pretty much just decided nas doesnt give a shit and been given the green light to turn the bots on. They are rampant. KC ownm, tiamat, vrtra, jorm, khimaira, cerberus, white coney at a minimum should all be given the auto claim function since there is just literally nothing else that can be done against botters. Anyone can feel free to add to that list. I'm sure the ownm one isn't so easy. But LoO was given auto claim for a reason. It's the same drop. And it's being cheated for months now. And it can't be proven. Auto claim is the only answer.

_________________
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Apr 29, 2020 9:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2018 1:30 pm
Posts: 37
Yea using low latency as an excuse is certainly plausible. I will say however at 4ms ping and a decent claim macro most of his claims would look like botting to the majority of the server.

4ms ping means you are roughly within 100 miles of the server and likely on the same ISP. I'd post some technical information on how to calculate that and the geographic location of the proxy server, but i'm guessing that would be frowned upon.

If his claims haven't gone down in the last 13 days(when Nasomi updated DNS to point the server 1 DNS name to the Las Vegas IP) then 1 or more these are true:

1. He has overridden the server 1 DNS name to point to the original server 1 IP address in NJ. Not very difficult anyone can do this but seems shady. Not sure Nasomi's stance on this or his reasoning for the change.
2. He is able to find Nasomi's direct IP that isn't behind the reverse proxy setup he uses. This is difficult to do and i'm guessing would piss Nasomi off royally. This is how you would bypass Nasomi's DDOS protection..
3. He is botting

In the current environment he would be getting the latency of server 2 and therefore couldn't use low latency as an excuse unless either 1, 2, or 3 is true. So which is it Zigma?


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Apr 29, 2020 10:19 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2017 11:55 pm
Posts: 223
Location: In your moms bed
Savok wrote:
Yea using low latency as an excuse is certainly plausible. I will say however at 4ms ping and a decent claim macro most of his claims would look like botting to the majority of the server.

4ms ping means you are roughly within 100 miles of the server and likely on the same ISP. I'd post some technical information on how to calculate that and the geographic location of the proxy server, but i'm guessing that would be frowned upon.

If his claims haven't gone down in the last 13 days(when Nasomi updated DNS to point the server 1 DNS name to the Las Vegas IP) then 1 or more these are true:

1. He has overridden the server 1 DNS name to point to the original server 1 IP address in NJ. Not very difficult anyone can do this but seems shady. Not sure Nasomi's stance on this or his reasoning for the change.
2. He is able to find Nasomi's direct IP that isn't behind the reverse proxy setup he uses. This is difficult to do and i'm guessing would piss Nasomi off royally. This is how you would bypass Nasomi's DDOS protection..
3. He is botting

In the current environment he would be getting the latency of server 2 and therefore couldn't use low latency as an excuse unless either 1, 2, or 3 is true. So which is it Zigma?


On zigmas case its 3...... anyone that argues for him has no clue what they are talking about. You dont instant claim a mob that pops in a group mobs without tabing through or moving your head. Clear blatant botting on his part. He isnt the only one people are using auto spammer programs to afk claim coney for a very long time now. Any mob that is a pop claim is most likely getting claimed is using auto spammers or bots at this point.

On the other hand i tried everything possible to reduce my ping back to what it was week before.

_________________
SapaJoee / SapDaddy

Best PLD on Nasomi
Best BRD on Nasomi
TopShelf MVP 2017-2020
Voted Nasomi Server Player of the Century Award
Sackholder in TS


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Apr 30, 2020 2:34 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu May 09, 2019 3:15 am
Posts: 56
it pops purple to infil and aioko (ping around 4-8 iirc), its a bot, also the fact that curing him seems to actually fuck with his ability to claim makes it even more apparent


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Apr 30, 2020 4:12 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2018 9:29 am
Posts: 72
Aeroo wrote:
Literally any mob that he wants to remain a competitive part of the game needs to be changed to auto claim. Ever since the Zigma video everyone has pretty much just decided nas doesnt give a shit and been given the green light to turn the bots on. They are rampant. KC ownm, tiamat, vrtra, jorm, khimaira, cerberus, white coney at a minimum should all be given the auto claim function since there is just literally nothing else that can be done against botters. Anyone can feel free to add to that list. I'm sure the ownm one isn't so easy. But LoO was given auto claim for a reason. It's the same drop. And it's being cheated for months now. And it can't be proven. Auto claim is the only answer.


As one of the so called "botters" autoclaim would be the best option. But for now I'll keep spamming my face into my keyboard for claims until he fixes his servers.

_________________
Frank
Image
Image
Image
Image


Last edited by Aik on Thu Apr 30, 2020 4:56 am, edited 2 times in total.

Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Apr 30, 2020 5:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2016 2:23 am
Posts: 1143
Aik wrote:
Aeroo wrote:
Literally any mob that he wants to remain a competitive part of the game needs to be changed to auto claim. Ever since the Zigma video everyone has pretty much just decided nas doesnt give a shit and been given the green light to turn the bots on. They are rampant. KC ownm, tiamat, vrtra, jorm, khimaira, cerberus, white coney at a minimum should all be given the auto claim function since there is just literally nothing else that can be done against botters. Anyone can feel free to add to that list. I'm sure the ownm one isn't so easy. But LoO was given auto claim for a reason. It's the same drop. And it's being cheated for months now. And it can't be proven. Auto claim is the only answer.


As one of the so called "botters" autoclaim would be the best option. But for now I'll keep spamming my face into my keyboard for claims until he fixes his servers.

Image


looks like your steal was already on cooldown so you never had a chance. gg

_________________
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image


Top
   
PostPosted: Thu Apr 30, 2020 5:17 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2018 9:29 am
Posts: 72
Aeroo wrote:
Aik wrote:
Aeroo wrote:
Literally any mob that he wants to remain a competitive part of the game needs to be changed to auto claim. Ever since the Zigma video everyone has pretty much just decided nas doesnt give a shit and been given the green light to turn the bots on. They are rampant. KC ownm, tiamat, vrtra, jorm, khimaira, cerberus, white coney at a minimum should all be given the auto claim function since there is just literally nothing else that can be done against botters. Anyone can feel free to add to that list. I'm sure the ownm one isn't so easy. But LoO was given auto claim for a reason. It's the same drop. And it's being cheated for months now. And it can't be proven. Auto claim is the only answer.


As one of the so called "botters" autoclaim would be the best option. But for now I'll keep spamming my face into my keyboard for claims until he fixes his servers.

Image


looks like your steal was already on cooldown so you never had a chance. gg


zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz pro player right here

_________________
Frank
Image
Image
Image
Image


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 132 posts ]  Go to page Previous 1 2 3 4 514 Next

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 32 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited